4
15% weight

STRUCTURAL LOCK-IN.

Degree to which legacy systems prevent adaptation. How trapped are you by decisions made decades ago?

MODULARSWAP ANYTHINGVSENTANGLEDTOUCH ONE, BREAK FIVE

FLEXIBLE VS FROZEN

1510
FieldTransitionParticle

THE SCALE

SCORE 1-3

Modular / Flexible

Systems can be swapped out independently. Technical debt is managed. Architecture decisions are reversible. Low switching costs.

SCORE 7-10

Structural Paralysis

Everything is entangled. Changing one thing breaks five others. Legacy systems that nobody understands but everyone depends on.

WHY IT MATTERS

Lock-in is compound interest on bad decisions.Every year you don't address it, the cost of change increases. Eventually, change becomes "impossible". Not technically, but economically.

THE MAINTENANCE TAX

Organizations with high structural lock-in spend 60-80% of IT budget maintaining existing systems. That leaves 20-40% for innovation. Field-state organizations invert this ratio.

70%
Maintenance (Particle)
30%
Maintenance (Field)

EXAMPLES

FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS (Score 1-3)

Shopify

Modular architecture. Can swap out components without rebuilding everything.

2.2
Stripe

API-first design. Decoupled services that can evolve independently.

1.5

LOCKED-IN SYSTEMS (Score 7-10)

Healthcare

EMR systems with 10+ year switching costs. Regulatory entanglement.

8.5
Phillips 66

40+ year refineries. Physical infrastructure that can't be unwound.

6.4

DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONS

1How much would it cost to replace your core systems?
2Are there vendor lock-ins or proprietary dependencies?
3Can processes be redesigned without massive investment?
4How entangled are your systems with each other?
5What percentage of budget goes to maintaining legacy?